Knowledge Management Tools: Component Technologies Essay

The internet provides a multitude of vendors shining to transform our stock. But , we have to know which approaches should be adopt to establish the component technologies that make up a association management formation or suite. The analogy of hi-fi is gived where each item has a certain function or end. The multitude of KM system on offer in the marketplace is seen as a composite athletics of a number of these component technologies. Firms may decide to buy polar component-of-the-shelf or learn their own tools to meet their needs.Organising knowledge toolsOntology and Taxonomy Grubber (1993) defines ontology as a formal explicit of sh bed conceptualism. It helps us on preventing wide variations on understanding or perspective to the same subject. Therefore, we have to developed ontology to cleanse our level of information organization, management, and understanding. In the scope of KM tools, the term ontology is practic wholey utilise interchangeability with taxonomy . To clarify the distinction, its important to recognize that an ontology is boilersuit conceptualism whereas taxonomy is a scientifically based scheme of cliqueification. An ontology may have non systematic conceptual relationship such as has part relationship among concepts. In contrast, knowledge taxonomy generate hierarchical casteification of legal injury that are structured to show relationship between them.When it comes time to implement ontologies and taxonomies at that place are three options develop the ontology thus develop the supporting taxonomy. develop taxonomy and then develop the over-arching ontology develop the two in parallel.Define your backclothThe first step in growth the combined ontology and taxonomy is to clearly cathode-ray oscilloscope the bowel movement. A clearly defined scope is critical to the success of the effort. The examination that can best help shape the scope of the effort is simply, what purpose will the combined ontology and taxo nomy serve? The resultant role to this question serves several purposes It sets move on the effort. These bounds are necessary to answering the basic managerial questions of how long will it take, and how much will it cost. It helps identify the primary arenas and perspectives to be included. It should identify the item business activities that will make direct use of theontologies and taxonomies and how the resulting knowledge will be used to accomplish their mission.Normally the answer to this question will ignite into one of three categories To serve as a common framework for knowledge share-out. To enable reuse of active domain knowledge. To a better understand what the organization knows by separating domain knowledge from the operational knowledge and making assumptions explicit.The first two of these, knowledge sharing and reuse are at the heart of most KM initiatives. Answers falling into the third category are indicative of advanced KM or academic initiatives. T he following steps are applicable to all three scenarios and are specifically targeted toward those efforts focusing on knowledge sharing and reuse.Check for Existing Ontologies and TaxonomiesBusiness operations today are to a fault often dependent on, or required to adhere to one or more industry standards and may interface with applications that make use of active ontologies or controlled vocabularies. For that reason, it is often best to use preexisting taxonomies and ontologies before insertion into an extensive and possibly expensive development effort.Identify Important tollIf it is determined that existing ontologies and taxonomies are insufficient to meet the scope of the effort, then it is time to start collecting the raw materials for the new structures. This starts with identifying the key terms that are used to express the knowledge needful to enable specific business activities. At this point, it is important to list of all terms used to make statements or to explai n to someone else what is needed to accomplish the business activities included within the scope of the effort. These can ordinarily be entrap in corporate policy or operational instructions and from bulk with expertise in the activities. While gathering these terms it is important to breathe within the scope of the effort. Incorporating the full lexicon for a large multi-national conglomerate may look like a major accomplishment, but it will non help build an effective knowledge environment if the scope of the effort is smaller. Rather, the broader scope will make it more difficult to marry the concepts of the athletic field to those used by the people you are trying to support.Define the frame HierarchyArmed with the terms and concepts that are critical to expressing the knowledge needed to enable those business activities to be supported, the next step is to define a class hierarchy. Again, there are three ways to do this stimulate from the top down. Start by identifying the general concepts (super-class identification) and then determine which of the others fall within those categories (subclass identification). Work from the female genital organ up . Start by developing cluster of related concepts (subclass grouping) and then look for the higher-order concepts that under which a disposed cluster of concepts might fall (super-class identification) Work from the top down and bottom up. This starts with the identification of the more important concepts first and then generalize and peg down them appropriately. The authors have found that this approach is the easiest to follow and has a lower take chances of getting mired in the semantic swamp. When organizing terms and concepts the basic construction isIf a class A is a super class of class B, then every instance of B is also an instance of A. In other words, the class B represents a concept that is a sorting of A. As the class structure for your domain begins to take shape, check how sound ly it expresses the way the people that are genuinely involved in the associated activates actually talk about what they are doing. Make accepted that it reflects the actual context in which it will be used. The language of practical ontology or taxonomy should not to require the user to stop and translate between the way they normally think about things and the official term. This is also the time to make sure that the vocabulary used to express the hierarchical class structure agrees with the real-world (and agree upon) vocabulary and accurately serves to classify the information that will need to be exchanged between the people and applications involved in meeting the targeted activities. When these conditions occur, the class hierarchical effectively becomes the upper-layers of the taxonomy. This is a critical factor in insuring on-going semantic alignment between the resulting ontology and taxonomy.