Consequentialism and Computing Ethics and Technology

Question: Discuss about the Consequentialism and Computing Ethics and Technology. Answer: Introduction: The ethics in AI is the part of the Ethics of technology particular to robots and other AI beings. It is mainly distinguished into robot ethics and human moral behavior as they construct, the design utilizes and threat AI beings and the machine ethics, which is effectively concerned with the moral behavior of AI agent known as AMAs. As per the Lin, Abney, and Bekey (2012), Australias big organizations are implementing AI with two-third planning to achieve the high quality of products and services. Moreover, organization utilizes the AI technologies in several functions such as planning, implementing, recognition and problem-solving. In addition to this, implementation of the AI technology is the negative impact on the human beings i.e. individuals are losing their job in a fast manner. Therefore the ethical dilemmas surrounding deployment of AI in Australia industries includes Unemployment, Inequality, Humanity, Artificial stupidity, Racist robots, security and robots rights. Implementation of the AI in Australia industries creates more complex roles in front of the individuals and moving from the physical employment to the cognitive labor that characterizes administrative and strategic employment in society. As stated by the Mu?ller (2011), deployment of the robots in organization lost the jobs of the person because they can be automated. By using AI technology an organization cut down on relying on the person workforce. Robots rights are the moral responsibility of society towards its instrument similar to the person. This contains liberty, a right of life, equity and freedom of though. They may increase the ethical issues since there will be a need for AI rights governing the above feature like the person. Critique Moor's Just-Consequential list Framework Consequences theories are focused on the consequence of deontological and actions theories that stress duties and rights. Certainly, deontological and consequentialism theories are mainly presented as desperately incompatible. When evaluating these theories the both harms and benefits also considered. Thus the good of this policies is that it is practice and efficient. As said by the James (1999), the bad point of these theories is that it is less flexible, ignores concerns the fairness for the minority population, offers only a negligible morality, and underestimates the significant of happiness and society value. Moreover, consequentialism is criticized for what it apparently allows. It apparently demands that in the definite situations innocents be beaten and deprived of material services or goods to produce high benefits for others. Consequences can possibly justify any type of policies, for it does not matter how damaging it is to. A good example of the consequentialism is that of the case standard referred as Transplant. A health professionals or surgeon has six patients dying due to o organ failure and one fit patient whose organ can save by six. Therefore in these circumstances, a surgeon will allow by consequentialism to take life the healthy patients to get his organization, presumptuous there is not applicable consequences other than the saving of the six and loss of the one person. Therefore, it sounds like the good but in practically it is not flexible and produces the best outcomes in-person situations. Compare and contrast the code of ethics Australia computer society objective is to deliver trustworthy independent skills and knowledge insight into the technology make effective technology capability and capacity in Australia (acs, 2016). ACS professionals standard procedures offer legal recognition of information and communication technology as a professional for first time. The schemes need members to adopt with higher rules and regulations of risks management, quality assurance and disciplinary rules as well as needed professionals level development. The code of ethics establishes the professional standards that are need by to direct the behavior of its members in most effective as well as efficient manner. If the member is not implemented the code of ethics established by the BSC then they are under a responsibility to notify the BSC immediately (bcs, 2017). Role and responsibilities of the member of the British Computer Society Codes of Ethics are to promote public understanding of information system and its pitfalls and benefits whenever needed. References acs. (2016).acs. [online] Available at: https://www.acs.org.au [Accessed 5 Apr. 2017]. bcs. (2017).bcs. [online] Available at: https://www.bcs.org/category/6030 [Accessed 5 Apr. 2017]. James, H. (1999). Just consequentialism and computing.Ethics and Information Technology. [online] Available at: https://www.idt.mdh.se/kurser/computing/DVA403/Lectures-2010/Moor.pdf [Accessed 2 Apr. 2017]. Lin, P., Abney, K. and Bekey, G. (2012).Robot ethics. 1st ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. Mu?ller, V. (2011).Fundamental issues of artificial intelligence. 1st ed. Bernard Gert (1999). Common Morality and Computing. Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1): 5764