'Dickens’ and Bronte’s Definition of Class Essay\r'

'People of the press down straines in Charles Dickens’ Oliver enlace and Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre have no expression of achieving utmoster status unless they come crosswise a miracle, such as receiving a previously unknown inheritance. This is shown in both the new(a)s of Jane Eyre and Oliver Twist. two of the primary(prenominal) characters grow up in similar situations; they argon both orphans and because of that fact they are treated resembling they were criminals from birth. Although Jane is break off off than Oliver in the places that she lives, they both go finished some of the uniform emotions end-to-end the fabrications. Both Dickens and Bronte lived in the selfsame(prenominal) time plosive consonant and their novels were published within ten years of either(prenominal) early(a).\r\nIn their novels they show the England they perceived as ace that is overly obsessed with class. Neither of the authors agreed with this irresistible impulse and criticized it in their own ways. Dickens showed this by victimization sarcastic remarks when describing the rich, and (as well as Bronte) characterized almost all of the speed class as be shocking in nonpareil way or a nonher. They range the point across that incisively because a somebody is born distressing doesn’t make them whatso incessantly less intelligent, polite, or honorablely inapt.\r\nIn the novel of Oliver Twist, Dickens describes that poor pile are safe as intelligent and broad(a) as the rich, it’s the way the rich treat them that forces the poor to steal. with out the novel he dress ups examples of how intelligent and secure Oliver Twist is treated like an animal just because he is an orphan. One of some examples of this is Mrs. Sowerberry’s response when her husband guides Oliver to come over to help with the chore business and to live with them. She talks about Oliver as though he is an animal, â€Å"I see no saving in p arish children, not I; for they eer cost more to keep than they are worth.” (p30)\r\nThis infrastructure is similar in Jane Eyre. Bronte shows that orphans, unless they have capital, are viewed as the lowest class of a house hold. Jane encounters this throughout her childhood, it was first brought to her attention by Mrs. vibrating reed who says, â€Å"…you are less than a servant, for you do zip for your keep.” (p69) equal Oliver, Jane does nothing to deserve such a acidulous classification, except for being born. They both try their opera hat to follow the rules and to be good people.\r\nPoor people basically have two choices to live in 19th century England as shown in Oliver Twist they could live on the streets by begging and/or stealing, up to nowtually being put into jail or to death because of the anti begging laws and harsh penalties for stealing. The other choice the poor have is to work in the workhouses for no capital, scarce food, and poor tre atment. Upper class England created these workhouses to disclose the lower class by t all(prenominal)ing them to be humble, have discipline and good morals. ironically the workhouses created just the same thing they intended to amount rid of, criminals. The food was so scarce that it obligate them to steal and campaign, and the treatment of the children were so bad it do them alienated from normal society. Bronte describes the same attitude of the upper class while Jane is at Lowood, though it is not as extreme as the workhouses Dickens talks of.\r\nThe girls of Lowood were all orphans and because of that they obviously had to be corrected for they were naturally going to turn into bad people. So Mr. Brockelhurst image that good morals come from no food, plainness, lack of necessities and constant humiliation. This produced an â€Å"every man for themselves” society among the girls when the susceptibility was gone. The older girls got to be the closest to the fire w hen it was cold, and when ever they had a take a chance they would take food from the younger, weaker girls. â€Å"From this deficiency of nourishment resulted an abuse, which pressed cloggyly on the younger pupils: when ever the famished great girls had an opportunity, they would coax or menace the little ones out of their portion.” (JE BV p122) If things had not changed for the better in that school Jane may have beseem a very variant person than she moody out to be.\r\nthough both Jane and Oliver are mantic to be immoral and no good orphans in 19th century England’s eyes, they have the highest set of morals than any other person in their stories. Oliver never wants to steal from anybody and never starts a fight unless his family is concerned. Even though all of the people he hung out with were thieves he just couldn’t do it, stealing horrified him and he wanted no part in it. Jane refuses to splice Rochester because she takes it to be misemploy to stoop herself down to a mistress. She in like manner thinks it is amiss(p) to marry for money and not make do. Jane displays this by turn down St James although he has a high standing in society, she feels he is a stinking man and would not be happy if she were to marry such a man.\r\nThe immoral people in both novels, are the upper class who retrieve themselves to be better than the main characters. Mr. Bumble, for example, marries Mrs. Corney because of her wealth and nothing to do with her as a person. When he came to work with her he checked around her apartment for pricey things that would distinguish her as wealthy. â€Å"He opened the closet, counted the tea-spoons, weighed the sugar-tongs, about inspected a silver milk-pot to ascertain that it was of the genuine admixture…and spreading himself before the fire with his back towards it, seemed to be mentally engaged in taking an get inventory of the furniture” (p185) To make the situation all the same more ironic, Mrs. Corney is only wealthy because she stole the money for the poor people’s food and vestments and kept it for herself.\r\nShe jokes about how the cats have a better life than those of the people she looks after. By the end of the composition the couple is described as miserable. In the novel of Jane Eyre, Mr. Brockelhurst is supposed to be a religious and moral man, but he deprives the children of food and clothing to usefulness his own pocket. He is a hypocrite also for example, he tells a girl with nappy bull to get it cut off, when his own daughter has the same kind of curly hair. His attitude and the attitudes of other centre upper class people are all the same of that time. They think that they deserve to have the curly hair and the extra money at the write off of the poor, because they are physically and divinely better than them.\r\nThough all of this injustice is happening to the poor, they have no way to fight back. They don’t even have rights in court houses. When Oliver is brought to trial for strip pocketing, the judge, Mr. Fang, sentences Oliver even though there is no hard evidence and a testimony saying he is innocent. Oliver can not even talk in his own defense, partly because he is so stock(a) and hungry and party because the magistrate wouldn’t give him the chance to. If the book keeper had not demanded to speak in Oliver’s defense, Oliver would have surely died. When Jane was living with her auntie she had no say at all in what was done with her. She could be beat by keister Reed and tormented by her aunt Reed and she would had to take it.\r\nMarriage and class is a compositors case that both Bronte and Dickens speak of. They both believe that the English tradition of marrying for money and status were imbecile and that marrying for love was the true way to happieness. This is exhibited in many examples in Oliver Twist. For one, Oliver is born out of true love and he turns out to be a good boy and always makes moral decisions. Oliver’s fractional brother, Monks was born of a fixed, loveless, financial spousal relationship, and he moody out to be evil and mischievous his entire life. Dickens also describes the love between bloom and blight.\r\nThe people of England were so critical on who one married, that Rose didn’t want to marry Harry because she felt that people would think that she slept with him before hymeneals just to get his money and that Harry would be shunned by his peers for marrying her. When they finally did marry, they were very happy with all(prenominal) other. As opposed to Bumble’s marriage which turned out to be miserable for him and his wife. Jane ends up marrying Rochester out of love rather than St James for money and status. But she was more comfortable in marrying him when that she got her money because she felt like an equal to him, rather than a servant.\r\nDickens and Bronte touch on the same subjects throug h out their novels and have a lot of the same view points. The time that they wrote was one of extreme technicality and cruelty. It would be safe to say that both authors wrote for different reasons than just to entertain. Points were made about the absurdity of marriage, of being â€Å"born” into divine upper or lower class, and of horrible ways humans treated each other just because they thought they were better. Both novels had the some good people that helped out Oliver and Jane so that they could get by in life long decent to receive their long lost inheritance. These books show that poor people are equal to the rich ones in intelligence, moral values, and politeness. They also made evident that the way society was running in those days was pain way too many good people of England.\r\n'