A summarizing critique of: Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards.By Hillman. A. J., Shropshire. C. , Cannella Jr. A. A. (2007) In: Academy of Management Journal, 50: 941 - 952.

This phrase was an exploratory one it tested and true to identify characteristics and the conditions that makes a firms board much presumable to accommodate female person someone directors and answering the question: wherefore do many firms nonplus women on their boards but others dont? (p.941) The authors tried to identify the benefits directors whoremaster bring for the boards establish on resource dependence possibility (Pfeffer & adenine; Salanick, 1978). Because it studies directors c atomic number 18less(predicate) of the grammatical gender, they unite it with Work-group-level diverseness theories to identify latent benefits of female bureau on boards of directors(p.942). Hillman rivet on organizational characteristics and earlier cogitate researches foundations such as Dalton et la Assumption: firms that deal give out with environmental uncertainly coiffe better (1999), in plus to Pfeffer and Salanick proposal: organizations can charter three benefits from board linkages which are: advice and counsel, legitimacy, and channels for communicating (1978:145, 161), taking in retainer Amason seam that the benefit of gender diversity can improve brainstorming, creativity, consideration of diverse perspectives more than the thinkable negative implication for communication (1996). Firms deliver benefits from having women on their boards; Peterson (2007:179) claims since the appearance of the B&P study, there has been increase published evidence, twain anecdotal and empirical, of the benefits of having female directors on boards.

Authors outlined four hypotheses summarized: the female representation on boards of directors positively associated with organization sizing, female employees numbers, and colligate to other firms with female directors, and the firms level of diversification. They used purposive ingest by selecting the spinning aggrandizement 1000 public traded U.S firms that had the largest sales, and filtering it to 950 firms the try is large but not representative, the small and medium size firms were not represented in the sample, which led to a frail generalisation for their results. The investigator adopted the deductivism... If you want to describe a full essay, enunciate it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper